x-rayted
Forum Bağımlısı
- Kayıt
- 20 Eylül 2011
- Mesaj
- 1.228
- Tepki
- 937
- Şehir
- istanbul, Maltepe
- İsim
- Cenk K.
- Başlangıç
- 1972—73
- Bisiklet
- Bisan
- Bisiklet türü
- Yol bisikleti
Bunu birkaç hafta önce "bisiklet iktidarsızlık yapar mı" isimli şu başlığa da yazmıştım.
https://www.bisikletforum.com/showthread.php?t=110991
Aynen buraya da alıyorum.
Genel olarak iktidarsızlık yapabilir, kısırlık yapmaz ve prostat kanser riskini artırır diye bilinir.
Ama bu yıl İngiltereden yayınlanan en büyük gruplu çalışmada (5282 erkek bisikletçi) bisiklet kullanma ile iktidarsızlık ve kısırlık arasında hiç bir korelasyon bulunamadı. Bisiklet iktidarsızlık ve kısırlık yapmıyor denebilir.
Buna karşın serum PSA seviyelerinin biraz arttığı ve prostat kanser riskinin arttığı saptanmıştır.
(link)
Edit: Pardon yaa linki kaldırmışlar . Ben tekrar arayayım
Ama o başlıkta okuyan arkadaşlar vardı
2. edit :Ancak abstract ını bulabildim. keşke o zaman tümünü indireymişim.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cycling is a popular sport among men. Despite its health benefits, fears have been raised regarding its effects on erectile dysfunction (ED), fertility, and on serum prostate-specific antigen levels. This study aimed to examine associations between regular cycling and urogenital abnormalities in men.
Methods: A cross-sectional population study of 5,282 male cyclists was conducted in 2012–2013 as part of the Cycling for Health UK study. The data were analyzed for risk of self-reported ED, physician-diagnosed infertility, and prostate cancer in relation to weekly cycling time, categorized as <3.75, 3.75–5.75, 5.76–8.5, and >8.5 hours/week.
Results: There was no association between cycling time and ED or infertility, disputing the existence of a simple causal relationship. However, a graded increase (p-trend=0.025) in the risk of prostate cancer in men aged over 50 years (odds ratios: 2.94, 2.89, and 6.14) was found in relation to cycling 3.75–5.75, 5.76–8.5, and >8.5 hours/week, respectively, compared to cycling <3.75 hours/week.
Conclusions: These null associations refute the existence of a simple causal relationship between cycling volume, ED, and infertility. The positive association between prostate cancer and increasing cycling time provides a novel perspective on the etiology of prostate cancer and warrants further investigation.
https://www.bisikletforum.com/showthread.php?t=110991
Aynen buraya da alıyorum.
Genel olarak iktidarsızlık yapabilir, kısırlık yapmaz ve prostat kanser riskini artırır diye bilinir.
Ama bu yıl İngiltereden yayınlanan en büyük gruplu çalışmada (5282 erkek bisikletçi) bisiklet kullanma ile iktidarsızlık ve kısırlık arasında hiç bir korelasyon bulunamadı. Bisiklet iktidarsızlık ve kısırlık yapmıyor denebilir.
Buna karşın serum PSA seviyelerinin biraz arttığı ve prostat kanser riskinin arttığı saptanmıştır.
(link)
Edit: Pardon yaa linki kaldırmışlar . Ben tekrar arayayım
2. edit :Ancak abstract ını bulabildim. keşke o zaman tümünü indireymişim.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cycling is a popular sport among men. Despite its health benefits, fears have been raised regarding its effects on erectile dysfunction (ED), fertility, and on serum prostate-specific antigen levels. This study aimed to examine associations between regular cycling and urogenital abnormalities in men.
Methods: A cross-sectional population study of 5,282 male cyclists was conducted in 2012–2013 as part of the Cycling for Health UK study. The data were analyzed for risk of self-reported ED, physician-diagnosed infertility, and prostate cancer in relation to weekly cycling time, categorized as <3.75, 3.75–5.75, 5.76–8.5, and >8.5 hours/week.
Results: There was no association between cycling time and ED or infertility, disputing the existence of a simple causal relationship. However, a graded increase (p-trend=0.025) in the risk of prostate cancer in men aged over 50 years (odds ratios: 2.94, 2.89, and 6.14) was found in relation to cycling 3.75–5.75, 5.76–8.5, and >8.5 hours/week, respectively, compared to cycling <3.75 hours/week.
Conclusions: These null associations refute the existence of a simple causal relationship between cycling volume, ED, and infertility. The positive association between prostate cancer and increasing cycling time provides a novel perspective on the etiology of prostate cancer and warrants further investigation.